Language Acquisition
Psychology 598-02
Martin Packer
Summer 2001
June 5 Ð July 12
Tuesday, Thursday 1:30 - 4:45
COLH 345
This course explores childrenÕs
learning of oral language. Language is often said to be what makes us human.
It is perhaps the most complex, perplexing and complicated of human phenomena,
yet children are able to grasp its core characteristics by the time they are
a couple of years old. We still barely know how this happens.
Language stands at a point
of intersection between the child's experience of the world and the culture
into which the child is born. Language
is a public system of representation that defines the universal, but it is
taken up as a personal means for expression of a particular life. We will explore research and theory that
comes mainly from what might be called ÒtraditionalÓ Anglo-American academic
psychology, because a familiarity with this work is essential for a number
of reasons. It is important to
be able to talk with people trained Òtraditionally.Ó But we will also explore
what can loosely be called ÒalternativeÓ theory and research, from continental
philosophy and elsewhere (such as Ò2nd generation cognitive scienceÓ). But
this dichotomy (traditional/alternative) is already dissolving, as psychology
becomes more aware of cultural factors and effects, more diverse itself, and
influenced by the work of people like Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Lacan and others.
Objectives
of the Course:
This course should provide
you with:
¥ general familiarity with
the ways linguists approach the task of analyzing language.
¥ ability to recognize the
names of some of the major figures in child language research: Noam Chomsky,
Roger Brown, Lois Bloom, Katherine Nelson, Catherine Snow, Dan Slobin, Elizabeth
Bates, Steven Pinker, George Lakoff, Michael Halliday, David Crystal, Elizabeth
Bates, Brian MacWhinney, and others.
¥ familiarity with the general
sequence of language development (prelinguistic communication; one word stage,
telegraphic speech, etc.).
¥ some experience with empirical
material (recordings; transcripts) as well as abstract descriptions (phrase
structure grammars; formal semantics, etc.).
¥ familiarity with the various
perspectives on the study of childrenÕs language (nativist, cognitivist, interactionist,
functional, etc.).
¥ awareness of the philosophical
assumptions underlying these perspectives.
¥ a start exploring the implications
of adopting different philosophical assumptions.
Class 1: Introduction & Overview
Today we will discuss the
organization of the class, and the responsibilities of the participants, both
students and instructor.
One way of thinking about
language acquisition is that when children learn language they have to crack
a code. Language is a conventional system that is encoded in a variety of
interrelated ways. Today we will consider the 4 levels of language: sound,
word, sentence & utterance, and the four corresponding kinds of analysis:
phonemics, morphology, syntactics, & pragmatics. In other words, weÕll
be looking at the way language is complexly structured at a variety of levels,
and exploring the basics of what linguists have discovered about this structure.
Without starting to attempt
to explain how children learn
language, we can describe in
general terms what happens (for example, when one-word utterance appear, and
so on). We will begin thinking about the way that children crack the complex
code of language.
We will also watch a video
from the ÒLanguageÓ series. YouÕll see and hear Noam Chomsky and a variety
of linguists influenced by his work, including Steve Pinker, Leila Gleitman,
Dan Slobin and others.
Class 2: Phonology & Morphology
This and the next two classes
will be dedicated to unpacking in more detail the linguistic code at each
of its levels. We need to know what language is before we can begin to consider
how children come to be able to speak.
Today weÕll look at the way
linguists have characterized the phonological level of language, and the morphological level.
reading:
Handouts on Phonology and
Morphology
Brownlee (1998)
Class 3: Syntax
Today we look at the way linguists
characterize the syntactic level
of language. Noam ChomskyÕs work had a tremendous impact on child language
research, and continue to define a largely nativist view of language acquisition.
The readings for todayÕs class include a piece by Steve Pinker, an outspoken
Chomskian, as well as a chapter by Lakoff & Johnson, very critical of
ChomskyÕs approach to language.
WeÕll view Part 2 of the ÒLanguageÓ series where youÕll see
Chomskians arguing that language is so complex it must be innate.
WeÕll
also conduct a live observation of a 20-month old child.
reading:
Parker & Riley 4
Pinker (2001): an outspoken
nativist
Lakoff & Johnson (1999):
a critique of the philosophy underlying ChomskyÕs linguistics
CHAT manual (from the CHILDES
web site)
homework:
Take a look at the web site
of the Child Language Date Exchange System, housed at Carnegie-Mellon University:
http://childes.psy.cmu.edu
Download the CHAT, CLAN, and
Data manuals. CHAT is the transcription
system, CLAN is the analysis software, and the Data manual describes the different
corpora of data archived at CHILDES, including Roger BrownÕs transcripts of
Adam, Eve, and Sarah.
(Note that youÕll need the
free Acrobat Reader from adobe.com
to read these papers and the manuals.)
While
youÕre online, check out the Child Language Bulletin. Available as PDF at http://atila-www.uia.ac.be/IASCL/
Class 4: Semantics & Pragmatics
Semantics is the study of meaning: word meaning, and sentence
meaning. In addition, when we talk it is to do something; to accomplish something practical. This seems
obvious, yet study of pragmatics has lagged behind study of phonology, syntax or semantics. It is now,
however, probably the most exciting part of linguistics. And it is very important
for an understanding of childrenÕs language. Today weÕll explore both semantics and pragmatics, including
speech act theory, notions of conversational implicature, and conversation
analysis.
reading:
P&R
2, 3
Garvey (1984): this provides
an introduction to childrenÕs talk,
in case youÕre impatient to get to the pragmatics of child language.
Class 5: Telegraphic Utterances
The systematic study of childrenÕs
language began with a focus on grammar: only possible when children are combining
words. Today weÕll explore in greater detail the program of developmental
psycholinguistics that was inspired by the 1957 publication of ChomskyÕs Syntactic
Structures. WeÕll begin with the
work of Roger Brown at Harvard, and trace the lines of research from there.
reading:
Slobin (1988) : a first-person
retrospective on Roger BrownÕs project.
Schlesinger (1975) : good
overview of research on early grammar.
= Antinucci & Paresi (1975): a proposal for a semantic analysis of early utterances.
homework
Browse the Journal of Child
Language in the Gumberg Library,
and see if you can judge how the topics have changed over its 27 years of
publication.
Class 6: Holographic Utterances
Next we take a step backwards
from two-word to one-word utterances. This time of Òholophrastic speechÓ is
a distinct phase that has been looked at in a variety of ways.
We can look at the pragmatics
of one-word utterancesÑhow they
are used; the social functions they serve; the semanticsÑwhat these words refer to; their phonologyÑfor such words have a characteristic Òbaby talkÓ pronunciation;
and, surprisingly, their syntaxÑtheir grammatical form and even their grammatical structure.
reading:
Halliday (1975) : a case-study
of the ÒfunctionalÓ roots of language.
Scollon (1979): how adults
assist in the transition from 1- to 2-word speech.
Class 7: Cognitive Precursors to Language
What does cognition contribute
to language? The views of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky are often contrasted.
Today weÕll take a look.
reading:
Piaget (1937/1955): Piaget describes sensory-motor intelligence
culminating in the capacity for representation.
= Piaget (1946/1962): a chapter in PiagetÕs book on the Òsemiotic function.Ó
More complex, but well worth looking at.
Vygotsky (1986): a review and critique of PiagetÕs early
writing on early childhood.
= Brown(1988) & Lucy (1988): two appraisals of the Piaget/Vygotsky
debate, published in the Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative
Human Cognition.
Class 8. Social Precursors
What
does social interaction contribute to language?
reading:
Bruner (1983): explores the
infantÕs move from communication into language.
Lock (1999): a review of the
preverbal stage.
Bates et al. (1979): a Piagetian
approach to the interpersonal precursors to speech.
Class 9. Putting the Pieces Together
Can we tell a complete story
on the basis of the aspects of childrenÕs language we have now explored? Or
is something missing?
reading:
CLAN manual (from the CHILDES
web site): pages to be assigned.
homework:
Conduct an MLU analysis on
the Brown corpus, using CLAN.
Class 10: Bringing in the Body
The suggestion has been made
by a number of people that the body has been left out of standard linguistic
approaches to language, and hence it is left out of the story of language
acquisition.
reading:
Merleau-Ponty (1945/1962)
Hanks (1996a), (1996b)
= Ruthrof 1997): an ambition, if unsatisfying, attempt
at a Òbodily semantics.Ó
= Sudnow (1979): talk as embodied. Short, good.
= MacWhinney (n.d.): a ÒconnectionistÓ approach that puts ÒperspectiveÓ
at the center of language acquisition.
homework:
Take a look at Brian MacWhinney's
home page, with a statement of his philosophy of language acquisition: http://psyling.psy.cmu.edu/Brian/
Class 11. From Epistemology to Ontology
One striking feature of both
psychological and linguistic explanations of childrenÕs language is how mentalist and epistemological they are. A typical statement, for example, is that
Òmeaning is a mental eventÓ (Berko Gleason, 1997 p. 124). Can we offer something
better?
reading:
Egan (1997): oral language as the basis for childrenÕs
ÒmythicÓ understanding.
Fink (1995): chapter to be
assigned.
= Kristeva (1984): influenced by Lacan and Freud.
homework:
outline your final paper
Class 12. Wrapping Up
WeÕll look back at how far
weÕve managed to come, evaluate the course, and each student will offer a
brief descriptions of your paper topic.
Design
Decisions:
This course structure may
need modification as we proceed, but I have been guided by the following considerations:
¥ IÕve assigned less reading
for the Thursday class than for the class on Tuesday, so you'll have the weekend
to do the reading.
¥ Similarly, IÕve assigned
homework only over the weekend.
¥ (Readings are due the day they are listed. For example, you should read
the Piaget chapters before class
#7.)
¥ I cannot find a textbook
on child language that adequately acknowledges the theoretical frameworks
that dominate the field, and the extent to which they shape the Òdata.Ó There
are a couple of textbooks listed below (Berko Gleason; Owen) that you might
find helpful for reference, but rather than assigning a text IÕve selected
original papers.
¥ On the other hand, I donÕt
think we can manage without a textbook on linguistics. Linguistics for
Non-Linguists, by Parker and Riley,
is available at Amazon.Com for $41, deliverable in 24 hours. If you want to
share or borrow a copy, thatÕs fine. Unfortunately the Gumberg Library doesnÕt
have a copy. And unfortunately I will be assigning less than half the chapters
in this book. Any suggestions for a better way of handling this are welcomed!
¥ Although weÕll start by
exploring the way linguists have analyzed language, IÕve added some topics
from childrenÕs language alongside this: your exploration of the CHILDES web
site; a visit by a toddler in class #3; some introductory readings by Brownlee,
Pinker, and Garvey.
¥ WeÕll be retracing the history
of child language research when we move from telegraphic to holographic utterances,
to cognitive precursors, to social precursors. Children move in the opposite
direction, of course, but I think this strategy will highlight the philosophical
assumptions.
¥ And that is the sub-text
to this course, of course: weÕll engage in a critique of the philosophical/theoretical
presumptions that underlie research on child language. IÕve tried to start
introducing elements of this critique as early as possible in the course,
with Lakoff & Johnson (class #3). We could promote some of the other material
too, such as the writing by Merleau-Ponty or Egan.
¥ IÕm aware that thereÕs a
lot of reading assigned. Think of it as a smorgasbord rather than an imposition.
Take what you want, what you can digest. DonÕt try to absorb everything.
The readings marked with a dagger--=-- are more difficult, advanced readings, and can be
skipped.
¥ My intention is that each
student will be able to pick one from a variety of pathways through this course.
It should be possible for a doctoral student in the developmental program
to participate in a manner that is different from a master student taking
the course as a summer distraction. My expectations will of course be higher
for the former. We can talk more about this as the course progresses.
Paper
Topics:
Each student is expected to
complete a paper by the end of the summer session. I will be happy to meet
individually with students to help plan these papers. Possible paper topics
include:
¥ Review a topic (such as
negation, or metaphor) that continues to puzzle child language researchers.
¥ Collect speech data from
a child and conduct a descriptive analysis of it.
¥ What is the role of interpretation in language acquisition research.
¥ Explain a major transition
in the acquisition of language (e.g., from prelinguistic communication to
the first words; or from one-word to two-word utterances).
¥ Critique Merleau-PontyÕs
Consciousness and the Acquisition of Language.
¥ Pick a foreign language
(e.g., Spanish, French, Russian, Hebrew) and review the literature on its
acquisition.
¥ Put the body back into child
language research.
Summary of Class Topics and Assignments
|
1.
Introduction
June 5 Overview
of course
The
4 levels of language An overview of child language
|
2.
Phonology & Morphology
June 7 The first and second levels of language
reading: Handouts on phonology & morphology Brownlee (1998) |
|
3.
Syntax
June 12 The
third level of language
reading: Parker
& Riley 4, Pinker (2001) Lakoff
& Johnson (1999) CHAT
manual homework: CHILDES
web site |
4. Semantics & Pragmatics
June 14 The fourth level of language
reading: P&R 2, 3 Garvey (1984) |
|
5.
Telegraphic Utterances
June 19 The
stage of two-word utterances
reading: Slobin
(1988) Schlesinger
(1975) = Antinucci &
Paresi (1975) homework browse
Journal of Child Language |
6. Holophrastic Utterances
June 21 The stage of one-word utterances
reading: Halliday (1975) Scollon (1979)
|
|
7.
Cognitive Precursors
June 26 What
does cognition contribute to language?
reading: Piaget
(1937/1955), Vygotsky
(1986) = Piaget (1946/1962) = Brown (1988) = Lucy (1988) |
8. Social Precursors
June 28 What does social interaction contribute to language?
reading: Bruner (1983) Lock (1999) Bates et al. (1979) |
|
9.
Putting the Pieces Together
July 3 Can
we tell a complete story?
reading: CLAN
manual homework: Conduct
MLU analysis on Brown corpus |
10. Bringing in the Body
July 5 WhatÕs missing from the story? reading: Merleau-Ponty (1945/1962) Hanks (1996a), (1996b) = Ruthrof (1997),
= Sudnow (1979), = MacWhinney
(n.d.) homework: Look at MacWhinney home page |
|
11.
From Epistemology to Ontology
July 10 What
happens to the child? reading: Egan
(1997) Fink
(1995) = Kristeva 91984) homework: outline
your final paper |
12. Wrapping Up
July 12
course evaluations student paper abstracts
|
The
Following Readings are Available on the Web:
The first two articles are from a special issue of the
Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition
titled ÒComparing Piaget & VygotskyÓ, available at http://lchc.ucsd.edu/Histarch/oc88v10n4.PDF.
(Note that this is a PDF file,
and will require Acrobat Reader):
Brown, T. (1988). Why Vygotsky?
The role of social interaction in constructing knowledge. The Quarterly
Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 10(4),
111-117.
Lucy, J. A. (1988). The role
of language in the development of representation: A comparison of the views
of Piaget and Vygotsky. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative
Human Cognition, 10(4), 99-104.
Lock, A. (1999). Preverbal Communication. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~ALock/virtual/gavin.htm
(YouÕll
find other interesting writing by the ÒVirtual FacultyÓ if you go up a step
in this URL.)
MacWhinney, B. (n.d.). Perspective-taking
and grammar, http://psyling.psy.cmu.edu/Brian/papers/perspective.pdf
CHAT manual: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/pdf/chat.pdf
CLAN manual: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/pdf/clan.pdf
Pinker (2001) Words and rules. Eye on Psi Chi,
5 (3), 14-19. Available
at www.psichi.org/content/publications/eye/volume/vol_5/5_3/pinker.pdf
The
Following Materials are on Reserve in Gumberg:
Antinucci, F., & Parisi,
D. (1975). Early semantic development in child language. In E. H. Lenneberg
& E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Foundations of language development: A multidisciplinary
approach, (Vol. 1, pp. 189-201). New York: Basic Books. [xerox]
Bates, E., Camaioni, L., &
Volterra, V. (1979). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. In
E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics, (pp.
111-129). New York: Academic Press.
[book]
Bruner, J. S. (1983). From
communication to talking, in Child's talk: Learning to use language
: Norton. [xerox]
Brownlee, S. (1998,
June 15). Baby Talk. Reprinted from U.S. News & World Report. [xerox]
Egan, K. (1997). Mythic understanding.
In The educated mind: How cognitive tools shape our understanding.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [book]
Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian
subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Garvey, C. (1984). The nature of talk. Ch. 1 in Children's
talk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [xerox]
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975).
Learning how to mean. In E. H. Lenneberg & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Foundations
of language development: A multidisciplinary approach, (Vol. 1, pp. 239-265).
New York: Basic Books. [xerox]
Hanks, W. F. (1996a). Three
phenomenologies of language. Ch. 6 in Language and communicative practices.
Boulder: Westview Press. [xerox]
Hanks, W. F. (1996b). Saturation by context. Ch. 7 in Language
and communicative practices. Boulder: Westview Press. [xerox]
Lakoff, G., & Johnson,
M. (1999). Chomsky's philosophy and cognitive linguistics. Ch. 22 in Philosophy
in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought,
(pp. 469-512). New York: Basic Books.
[book]
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962).
The body as expression, and speech, Phenomenology of perception, (pp.
174-199). New York: The Humanities Press. [book]
Piaget, J. (1937/1955).
The construction of reality in the child: London: Routledge & Kegan
Paul. [?]
Piaget, J. (1945/1962). Transition
from sensory-motor schemas to conceptual schemas. Ch. 8 in Play, dreams
and imitation in childhood, (pp. 214-244). (C.Gattegno F. M. Hodgson,
Trans.). New York: Norton. [book]
Schlesinger, I. M. (1975).
Grammatical development: The first steps. In E. H. Lenneberg & E. Lenneberg
(Eds.), Foundations of language development: A multidisciplinary approach,
(Vol. 1, pp. 203-222). New York: Academic Press. [xerox]
Scollon, R. (1979). A real
early stage: An unzippered condensation of a dissertation on child language.
In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics
(pp. 215-227). New York: Academic Press. [book]
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Piaget's
theory of the child's speech and thought. Ch. 2 in Thought and language,
(pp. 12-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [book]
Slobin, D. I. (1988). From
the Garden of Eden to the Tower of Babel. In F. Kessel (Ed.), The development
of language and language researchers: Essays in honor of Roger Brown,
(pp. 9-22). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [xerox]
Other Library Resources: These are not
Required Reading
Aitchison, J. (1999). Linguistics.
(5 ed.). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Bates, E. Intentions, conventions,
and symbols. In E. Bates (Ed.), The emergence of symbols: Cognition and
Communication in infancy (pp. 33-68). New York: Academic Press.
Berko Gleason, J. (1997).
The development of language. (4 ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bloom, L. (1998). Language
acquisition in its developmental context. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.),
Handbook of Child Psychology. Volume 2: Cognition, Perception and Language,
(5 ed., pp. 309-370). New York: Wiley.
Braine, M. D. S. (1994). Is
nativism sufficient. Journal of Child Language, 21, 9-31.
Brown, R. (1973). A first
language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic
structures. Mouton: The Hague.
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review
of "Verbal behavior" by B. F. Skinner. Language, 35,
26-58.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects
of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dillard, J. L. (1973/1972).
Black English: Its history and usage in the United States. New York:
Vintage Books.
Francis, H. (1979). What does
the child mean? A critique of the 'functional' approach to language acquisition.
Journal of Child Language, 6, 201-210.
Golinkoff, R. M. (1981). The
case for semantic relations: Evidence from the verbal and nonverbal domains.
Journal of Child Language, 8, 413-437.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975).
Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold.
Howe, C. (1976). The meanings
of two-word utterances in the speech of young children. Journal of Child
Language, 3, 29-47.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lust, B. (2000). Requirements
for paradigm shift. Journal of Child Language, 27, 744-749.
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic
semantics: An introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
MacWhinney, B. (1998). Models
of the emergence of language. Annual Review of Psychology, 49,
199-227.
Maratsos, M. (1998). The acquisition
of grammar. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology.
Volume 2: Cognition, Perception and Language, (5 ed., pp. 421-466). New
York: Wiley.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964/1973).
Consciousness and the acquisition of language. (Hugh Silverman, Trans.).
Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ochs, E. (1979). Introduction:
What child language can contribute to pragmatics. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin
(Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 1-17). New York: Academic Press.
Owens, R. E. J. (2001). Language
development: An introduction. (5 ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Ruthrof, H. (1997). Semantics
and the body: Meaning from Frege to the postmodern. Toronto: University
of Toronto Press.
Scollon, R. (1976). Conversations
with a one year old: A case study of the developmental foundation of syntax:
The University Press of Hawaii.
Sudnow, D. (1979). Talk's
body: A meditation between two keyboards. New York: Knopf.
Woodward, A. L., & Markman,
E. M. (1998). Early word meaning. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook
of Child Psychology. Volume 2: Cognition, Perception and Language, (5
ed., pp. 371-420). New York: Wiley.
Other Web Resources:
"Child
Language Development"
This page is designed as a
guideline for parents to follow their child's normal language development. A simple timeline.
http://webpages.marshall.edu/~sowards9/title.html
More milestones:
http://www.geocel.com/communicate/develop.html%23lang%5Fdev
A
simple overview of childrenÕs language
http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/rbeard/acquisition.html
Glossary wizard of grammatical
terms:
http://134.82.7.4/cgi-bin/glossary.pl?/usr/users/acad/modern_lang/public/www/linguistics/glossary/linglos
Utrecht Lexicon of linguistics:
http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/
Grammars of many languages
(Creole, Danish, Dakota...):
http://www.yourdictionary.com/grammars.html
The anatomy of vowel production.
Point and click to hear sound, and see tongue position (requires Shockwave)
http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/linguistics/ln105/vowel/index.html
...and the articulation of
consonants (Shockwave):
http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/linguistics/ln105/cons/index.html
San Diego State Language Acquisition
Resources (still under construction, it seems)ÑElizabeth Bates is director:
http://larcdma.sdsu.edu/larcnet/home.html
The Center for Advanced Research
on Language Acquisition, at the University of Minnesota (Mainly 2nd language
instruction)
http://carla.acad.umn.edu/
The History of the StanfordChild
Language Research Forum:
http://www-csli.stanford.edu/~clrf/history.html
The
Child Language Research Center (CLRC), University of Iowa
(concerned with developmental
language disorders):
www.childlanguage.org/